Russische Staatsanwaltschaft argumentiert mit Verstößen gegen das Persönlichkeitsrecht

Moskau – Wegen seiner Forschungsarbeit über das Schicksal von Russland-Deutschen unter Sowjetdiktator Josef Stalin hat die russische Staatsanwaltschaft eine Verurteilung des Historikers Michail Suprun gefordert. Der Wissenschaftler habe mit seiner Datensammlung für das Deutsche Rote Kreuz in München und den Historischen Forschungsverein der Deutschen aus Russland mit Sitz in Nürnberg gegen russisches Persönlichkeitsrecht verstoßen. Suprun solle deshalb zu einer Geldstrafe von umgerechnet 3.600 Euro verurteilt werden, teilte die Staatsanwaltschaft in Archangelsk im Norden Russlands am Freitag nach Angaben der Agentur Interfax mit. >More

“The Great Patriotic War was won by our people, not by Stalin or even the generals,” Mr Medvedev said. “Their role was undoubtedly very serious but, at the same time, the people won the war at the cost of great efforts and a huge number of lives.

“Stalin committed mass crimes against the people. And despite the fact that he worked a lot, despite the fact that under his leadership the country achieved successes, what was done to his own people cannot be forgiven.” -> More

Since 2001, Dr. Vadim Birstein  and Susanne Berger have maintained a regular exchange with the archives of the Russian Federal Security Services (FSB) about still pending questions in the case of Swedish diplomat Raoul Wallenberg who disappeared in the Soviet Union in 1945. For decades Soviet and later Russian authorities have claimed that Wallenberg died in Lubyanka prison in Moscow on July 17, 1947.  The most recent discussions focused mainly on documentation that remains heavily censored. Among this material are the interrogation registers for Lubyanka prison for 1947. This past November, FSB archivists stated that they now believe that a Prisoner No. 7 who was interrogated on July 23, 1947, « with great likehood » was Raoul Wallenberg. If true, it would mark the first time Russian officials have publicly admitted that all previous statements about Wallenberg’s fate were incorrect.

The new information provided by the FSB Archives in November 2009  is two things for sure: Utterly surprising and at the same time maddeningly incomplete. People have repeatedly asked us: What difference do six days make? What does it matter that, according to FSB archivists, Raoul Wallenberg may have been alive six days after July 17, 1947, the day that Soviet and Russian authorities for five decades have claimed to be  his almost certain death date?

Well, if indeed confirmed, it matters quite a bit. Yes, the  revelations may ultimately turn out to postpone Wallenberg’s presumed death only by six days, but they also potentially cast the case in a whole new light.

For one, it opens up the conversation about Wallenberg’s fate that has been essentially dormant since 2001, when the Swedish-Russian Working Group, that had investigated the Wallenberg question from 1991-2001, presented its final report. While the Swedish side stressed that plenty of unresolved questions remained about what exactly happened to Raoul Wallenberg in Soviet captivity, especially when and how he had actually died, the Russian side took a much stronger position: Circumstantial evidence, it declared in its  conclusions,  left no other possibility than that of Wallenberg’s death  on July 17, 1947. The only concession made by Russian officials at the time was that Wallenberg death was in all likelihood not attributable to natural causes, but to secret execution.

The new information provided by FSB now offers important additional avenues of exploration, in part by elucidating older facts in the case.  As prisoners under official investigation, Prisoner No. 7 (Wallenberg?) and Vilmos Langfelder, Wallenberg’s driver were subjected to 16 long hours of interrogation on July 23, 1944. Langfelder claimed his personal possessions, including his money, the next day. So far we do not know if Prisoner No. 7 (Wallenberg?) did the same. This would be a most important indication that he too survived.

> More

Under decennier har sovjetiska och därefter ryska myndigheter hävdat att Raoul Wallenberg dog i Lubjankafängelset i Moskva den 17 juli 1947. Men i november 2009 uppgav arkivarier vid den ryska Federala säkerhetstjänstens FSB att de nu tror att en Fånge nummer 7 som förhördes den 23 juli 1947 ”med stor sannolikhet” var Raoul Wallenberg.

Sedan 2001 har vi, dr Vadim Birstein och Susanne Berger, regelbundet korresponderat med den ryska Federala säkerhetstjänstens (FSB) arkiv angående frågor som ännu är ouppklarade när det gäller den svenske diplomaten Raoul Wallenberg, som försvann i Sovjetunionen år 1945.
De nya uppgifter som FSB:s arkiv förmedlade i november 2009 kan åtminstone sägas vara två saker: ytterst förvånande men också högst ofullständiga.

Vad spelar det då egentligen för roll att Raoul Wallenberg, enligt arkivarierna vid FSB, kan ha varit i livet sex dagar efter den 17 juli 1947, det datum som sovjetiska och ryska myndigheter under femtio år har angett som hans förmodade dödsdag?

Om saken verkligen skulle kunna bekräftas betyder det faktiskt en hel del. Visserligen skulle kanske dessa avslöjanden i sista hand bara senarelägga Wallenbergs död med sex dagar, men de skulle också kunna kasta helt nytt ljus över fallet.

För det första öppnar det åter upp den diskussion om Wallenbergs öde som mer eller mindre legat i dvala sedan 2001, då den svensk-ryska arbetsgrupp som undersökt Wallenbergfrågan under perioden 1991–2001 presenterade sin slutrapport. De nya detaljer som förmedlats av FSB gör det möjligt att närma sig fallet utifrån andra viktiga utgångspunkter, bland annat därför att de klargör en del tidigare fakta.-> More